Subject: Comments to Jeffs new proposal

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 94 14:19:43 +0100

Here are some comments to Jeff's new proposal for mapped conversations.

- There are 3 places in appendix D saying that CPI-C does
  not support MAP_NAMEs. We need to change all 3 places.
  - page 398
  - page 399
  - page 402

- As mentioned by Jeff the OSI TP mapping needs update.

- We need changes in the include file cpic.h

- Table 7 on page 38 needs updates.

- We need new secondary return codes.

- We need new call_ids (page 319 and include files)

- We need the definition of map_name in table 18 (page 329)

- We need updates to the possible values of control_information_received
  (page 319 and include files), for example CM_EXPEDITED_MAPPED_DATA_AVAILABLE

- we need updates to the possible values of return_code
  (page 319 and include files), for example CM_UNKNOWN_MAP_NAME

- nearly all format descriptions in the proposal use wrong abbreviations
  for example CMEID instead of CMEMID on page 36

- we need a parameter received_length on the Receive_Mapped_Data call

- some parts of the proposal describe the map_name as a 1-64 character
  name, some as an integer. It should be a character name with character
  set 00640.

Peter Binninger

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Binninger                         Voice: (+49) 7531-87-4758
Computer Gesellschaft Konstanz mbH      Fax:   (+49) 7531-87-4888
(Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme)   Email: [email-masked]
Max-Stromeyer-Strasse 116
78467 Konstanz
Germany